Since
the end of the Cold War, numerous cooperative agreements between nations have
demonstrated that international cooperation (IC) is possible. When nations
cooperate, they do so on a voluntary basis and are able to abandon agreements
at will. Global governance, which is understood here as the
institutionalisation of IC, in the ideal case implies regulations aiming to
solve global problems through agreement enforcement and accountability of the
actors involved.
This essay argues that IC and global governance in their present form constitute a stepping-stone to a world government.
This essay argues that IC and global governance in their present form constitute a stepping-stone to a world government.
The
most established definition of cooperation in academic literature is the one by
Robert Keohane (1984).(1) Keohane assumes a conflictive policy situation at the
outset of each cooperative agreement. Policy adjustments are then negotiated to
bring agreements more in line with each actor’s preferences. Once both policies
become more compatible, the act of cooperation is completed. But does this
definition adequately describe IC across all fields? Also, does it describe IC
in the 21st century? There is evidence that it does not. The actual meaning of
the Latin cooperatio—joint operation—does not require a conflictive policy
situation at the outset. Neither does it require a policy adjustment to the
preferences of other actors. For a joint operation, it is sufficient that two
or more actors operate together using shared resources.(2) Keohane´s
definition, written primarily for security issues during the Cold War, no
longer seems appropriate for the wide range of IC in the 21st century.(3) Due
to its limitations, for this essay IC is redefined as follows: Cooperation
occurs when two or more actors are involved in a joint operation with shared
resources. This endeavour can be repeated whenever there is a commitment of all
actors. The initial purpose of cooperation can transform throughout time, but
it can also not lead to anything, or result in the complete opposite intended
(cp. Anderson 1999). In some cases, it can trigger new agreements between
governments, which may lead to change in international political relations.(4)
Past
accomplishments of IC can be demonstrated by looking at several examples. First
and foremost is the security cooperation between the United States and the
former Soviet Union after the end of the Cold War, which astonished
international society. Arms control and disarmament agreements, including the
Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty I (START I, 1991) and the establishment of
NATO’s Partnership for Peace (1994), the Russia NATO Council (2002), and the G8
Global Partnership against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass
Destruction (2002), constitute concrete initiatives of arms control and
denuclearisation. The U.S.–Russian cooperation was further strengthened by anti-terrorism
agreements enacted in the wake of 9/11.(5) Secondly, cooperation on
environmental concerns has been prevalent. Virtually all countries, since the
early 1990s, have agreed to sell lead-free gasoline and produce and sell
catalytically converted cars to reduce pollution from CO2. One of the biggest
successes of environmental cooperation has been the agreement to reduce
chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) emissions, as specified in the Montreal Protocol
(1997), in order to stop ozone depletion. The







0 comments:
Post a Comment